These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of myopia control spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets on peripheral visual acuity and central visual acuity with peripheral gaze.
    Author: Gao Y, Lim EW, Drobe B.
    Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 May; 43(3):566-571. PubMed ID: 36916874.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Myopia control spectacle lenses with peripheral lenslets are gaining popularity because they are non-invasive and easy to manage, and ongoing clinical trials have shown promising results. This study aimed to evaluate peripheral and central visual acuity (VA) with peripheral gaze in conditions where the eyes are turned to look obliquely through the lenslets. METHODS: High-contrast (100%) VA was measured at 300 cm and 10 lx. For each test, two lens designs were evaluated in counterbalanced order: a spectacle lens with highly aspherical lenslets (HALs) and a standard single-vision lens (SVL). The target screen was placed at a visual angle of 21.6° to the nasal side of the right eye. Sixteen adults (27-52 years of age; spherical equivalent refraction (SER), -8.75 D to +0.50 D) wearing their habitual visual correction performed all tests monocularly. RESULTS: Mean (SD) central VAs with peripheral gaze through the SVL and the HAL lens were 0.08 (0.13) and 0.17 (0.12) logMAR, respectively. The HAL lens reduced central VA with peripheral gaze by 0.10 (0.08) logMAR (p = 0.03). No significant correlation was observed between the impact of the HAL lens and other factors, such as age or SER. Peripheral VA was not significantly different through the two lenses (1.09 (0.06) logMAR and 1.09 (0.09) logMAR for the SVL and the HAL lens, respectively; p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Under high-contrast and low-luminance conditions, the HAL lens reduced central VA with peripheral gaze by approximately one line compared with the SVL. The impact on central VA did not vary with gaze direction, age or SER. The HAL lens did not affect peripheral VA in this condition.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]