These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison study of the Le Fort I osteotomy using 2- and 4-plate fixation.
    Author: Fujio M, Sayo A, Ogisu K, Chang Q, Tsuboi M, Hibi H.
    Journal: Nagoya J Med Sci; 2023 Feb; 85(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 36923624.
    Abstract:
    This study was conducted to evaluate the postsurgical stability of Le Fort I osteotomy using zygomatic buttress internal fixation alone with no piriform aperture internal fixation. Patients with maxillary retrognathia and mandibular prognathism underwent the Le Fort I osteotomy with a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. In group I, fixation was accomplished using titanium plate and screws placed at the piriform aperture and the zygomatic buttress (4 plates). In group II, fixation was accomplished using titanium plate and screws placed at the zygomatic buttress (2 plates). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and at 6 months to 1 year (T3) to evaluate skeletal movement. In total, 32 patients were included in this study. None of the patients had wound infection, dehiscence, bone fragment instability, and long-term malocclusion. Regarding point A and the posterior nasal spine (PNS), vertical and horizontal relapse in groups I and II did not differ significantly. In most hospitals, the maxilla was fixed using four plates (piriform aperture and zygomatic buttress); however, within the limitations of the study, the choice of the number of plates for osteosynthesis following Le Fort I osteotomy and repositioning of the maxilla can be left to the discretion of the surgeon without putting the patients at risk for increased relapse by careful intraoperative management.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]