These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biomechanical comparison of nitinol compression staples versus fully threaded lag screws for talonavicular arthrodesis.
    Author: Reddy PJ, Manning BT, Bezold W, Garlapaty A, Cook JL, Schweser K.
    Journal: J Orthop; 2023 Mar; 37():64-68. PubMed ID: 36974101.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Talonavicular arthrodesis (TNA) is indicated for treatment of disorders that require immobilization of the hindfoot. Lag screw fixation is considered the reference standard technique for TNA. Despite consistently favorable clinical results using lag screw fixation, it is still associated with higher than desired complication and failure rates. Nitinol compression staples have been used for TNA based on potential advantages over lag screw fixation. However, functional biomechanical data comparing lag screw and nitinol compression staples for TNA are lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare nitinol compression staples to fully threaded lag screws for use in TNA with respect to their biomechanical properties during functional robotic testing. METHODS: TNA was performed on cadaveric feet (n = 12; 6 matched pairs) using either two nitinol compression staples (Arthrex, Naples, FL) or two fully threaded lag screws (Arthrex, Naples, FL) in random order, alternating between paired left and right feet. After instrumentation, specimens were mounting in a robotic testing system and loaded at 89 N/sec from 30 N to 445 N for 1 min. Then, continuous compressive load of 445 N was applied while cycling from 30° plantarflexion to 15° dorsiflexion for 10 cycles. Optical tracking markers attached to the talus and navicular bone tracked displacements. Translation data were recorded along the X, Y, Z planes. Rotation data were recorded for roll, pitch, and yaw. Significant (p < 0.05) differences between fixation methods were determined using paired t-Tests for each measured variable. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between staples and screws for translation in X, Y, or Z planes. When comparing rotation (roll, pitch, and yaw), there were no statistically significant differences with the exception of increased roll rotation for staple fixation versus lag screw fixation during static compression testing (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Based on comparison to the reference standard lag screw fixation for clinically relevant biomechanical properties measured during functional robotic testing of the hindfoot, nitinol compression staples are a viable option for talonavicular arthrodesis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]