These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Using geographic information system to track children and optimize immunization coverage and equity in Karachi, Pakistan.
    Author: Siddique M, Iftikhar S, Dharma VK, Shah MT, Siddiqi DA, Malik AA, Chandir S.
    Journal: Vaccine; 2023 May 02; 41(18):2922-2931. PubMed ID: 37012115.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Despite the potential of geospatial technologies to track and monitor coverage, they are underutilized for guiding immunization program strategy and implementation, especially in low-and-middle-income countries. We conducted geospatial analysis to explore the geographic and temporal trends of immunization coverage, and examined the pattern of immunization service access (outreach and facility based) by children. METHODOLOGY: We extracted data to analyze coverage rates across different dimensions (by enrolment year, birth year and vaccination year) from 2018 till 2020 in Karachi, Pakistan using the Sindh Electronic Immunization Registry (SEIR). We conducted geospatial analysis to assess variation in coverage rates of BCG, Pentavalent (Penta)-1, Penta-3, and Measles-1 vaccines using Government targets. We also analyzed the proportion of children receiving their routine vaccinations at fixed centers and outreach and examined whether children received vaccinations at the same or multiple immunization centers. RESULTS: A total of 1,298,555 children were born, enrolled or vaccinated from 2018 till 2020. At the district level, analysis by enrollment and birth year showed coverage increased between 2018 and 2019 and declined in 2020, while analysis by vaccination year showed consistent increase in coverage. However, micro-geographic analysis revealed pockets where coverage persistently declined. Notably 27/168, 39/168 and 3/156 Union councils showed consistently declining coverage when analyzing by enrollment, birth and vaccination year respectively. More than half (52.2%, 678,280/1,298,555) of the children received all their vaccinations exclusively through fixed centers and, 71.7% (499,391/696,701) received all vaccinations from the same centers. CONCLUSION: Despite overall improving vaccination coverage between 2018 and 2020, certain geographic areas have consistently declining coverage rates, which is detrimental for equity. Making immunization inequities visible through geospatial analysis is the first step to ensure resources are allocated optimally. Our study provides impetus for immunization programs to develop and invest in geospatial technologies, harnessing its potential for improved coverage and equity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]