These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab.
    Author: Wada H, Teranishi H, Shimono A, Kato N, Maruyama S, Matsumoto M.
    Journal: Thromb J; 2023 Apr 18; 21(1):43. PubMed ID: 37072821.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is caused by complement dysregulation and is generally diagnosed by exclusion from other disorders of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, has been approved for aHUS treatment since 2013 in Japan. Recently, a scoring system was published to support diagnosis of aHUS. Herein we modified this scoring system to apply it to patients diagnosed with aHUS and treated with eculizumab, and assessed the association between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab. METHODS: One hundred eighty-eight Japanese patients who were clinically diagnosed with aHUS, treated with eculizumab, and enrolled in post-marketing surveillance (PMS) were included in this analysis. Some of parameters in the original scoring system were replaced with clinically similar parameters collected in the PMS to modify the system, hereafter referred to as the TMA/aHUS score, which ranges from -15 to 20 points. Treatment responses within 90 days after eculizumab initiation were also assessed, and the relationship between treatment response and TMA/aHUS scores calculated at TMA onset was explored. RESULTS: The median (range) TMA/aHUS score was 10 (3-16). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of TMA/aHUS score to predict treatment response to eculizumab was estimated as 10, and negative predictive value indicated that ≥ 5 points was appropriate to consider assessing the treatment response to eculizumab; 185 (98%) patients had ≥ 5 points and 3 (2%) had < 5 points. Among the patients with ≥ 5 points, 96.1% showed partial response and 31.1% showed complete response. One of the three patients with < 5 points met partial response criteria. No significant difference in the TMA/aHUS scores was observed between survivors and non-survivors, suggesting that the score was not appropriate to predict the outcome (i.e., survival/death) in patients treated with eculizumab. CONCLUSION: Almost all patients clinically diagnosed with aHUS scored ≥ 5 points and responded to eculizumab. The TMA/aHUS score system could become a supporting tool for the clinical diagnosis of aHUS and probability of response to treatment with a C5 inhibitor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was conducted as per good PMS practice guidelines for drugs (MHLW Ministerial Ordinance No. 171 of 2004).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]