MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Distinguish Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis From Other Causes of Progressive Temporomandibular Joint Destruction?
Author: Bousquet B, Kellenberger CJ, Caprio RM, Jindal S, Resnick CM.
Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jul; 81(7):820-830. PubMed ID: 37086749.
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Similarities in initial presentations of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement from juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), idiopathic condylar resorption, and other forms of progressive TMJ destruction in children create diagnostic confusion. Treatment pathways, however, depend on determination of etiology. The purpose of this study was to compare TMJ magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of patients with joint degeneration localized to the TMJs to those with JIA and TMJ involvement. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including subjects younger than 18 years that presented from February 2008 to October 2019 with clinical TMJ degeneration, a gadolinium-enhanced TMJ MRI and a negative pediatric rheumatologic workup (non-JIA group), and a series of age and sex-matched subjects with TMJ degeneration on gadolinium-enhanced MRI and JIA (JIA group). MRIs were evaluated in a blinded fashion by 1 pediatric radiologist. The primary outcome variable was the radiologist's accuracy in predicting study grouping, assessed in 1 randomly-selected joint per patient. Secondary outcome variables included MRI characteristics of inflammation, osseous damage and articular disc morphology. Independent samples t-tests, sensitivity/specificity, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests were computed as applicable, and P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The sample included 34 subjects: 16 non-JIA (75% female, age 13.9 ± 2.8 years) and 18 JIA (77% female, age 13.6 ± 2.8 years) (P ≥ .738). The radiologist correctly classified 64.7% of subjects as non-JIA or JIA (P = .078, sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 31.3%). Inflammatory and osseous findings were similar between groups (P ≥ .073). The disc was anteriorly displaced in 9 non-JIA and 0 JIA joints (P < .001, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%) and flattened in 3 non-JIA and 14 JIA joints (P = .006, sensitivity = 38.9%, specificity = 90.6%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Inflammatory and osseous findings on gadolinium-enhanced TMJ MRIs are insufficient to determine the etiology of progressive TMJ destruction. Disc characteristics, however, significantly differ between JIA and non-JIA etiologies and may be important in differentiating these conditions.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]