These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Relationship between diffuse fibrosis assessed by CMR and depressed myocardial strain in different stages of heart failure.
    Author: Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Hu X, Wang B, Yang J, Zhao X, Zhang L.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jul; 164():110848. PubMed ID: 37156180.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent of the left ventricular (LV) diffuse myocardial fibrosis and the association with the degree of impaired myocardial strain in different stages of heart failure. BACKGROUND: The increased diffuse myocardial fibrosis impairs the LV systolic and diastolic function. Previous studies found that the global longitudinal strain (GLS) impacted survival in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, limited data are available regarding the association between the degree of diffuse myocardial fibrosis and the severity of impaired myocardial strain in HFpEF. METHODS: Sixty-six consecutive participants with heart failure (HF), and 15 healthy controls underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination. T1 mapping to calculate extracellular volume fractions (ECV) were used to assess diffuse myocardial fibrosis. ECV and myocardial strains were compared among the 3 groups. Associations between these two factors were also explored. RESULTS: The patients with HFpEF showed increased myocardial ECV fractions (32.9 % ± 3.7 % vs. 29.2 % ± 2.9 %, p < 0.001) compared with the control group. The patients with HFm + rEF also had increased myocardial ECV fractions (36.8 % ± 5.4 % vs. 32.9 % ± 3.7 %, p < 0.001) compared with HFpEF. The myocardial ECV was significantly correlated with the GLS (r = 0.422, p = 0.020), global circumferential strain (GCS) (r = 0.491, p = 0.006), and global radial strain (GRS) (r = -0.533, p = 0.002) in the HFpEF groups, but no significant correlation was found in the HFm + rEF group (GLS: r = -0.002, p = 0.990; GCS: r = 0.153, p = 0.372; GRS: r = 0.070, p = 0.685) CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF, only patients with HFpEF exhibited a significant correlation between increased diffuse myocardial fibrosis and impaired myocardial strain. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis plays a unique role in affecting myocardial strain in patients with HFpEF.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]