These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in sepsis of immunocompromised patients.
    Author: Li X, Liang S, Zhang D, He M, Zhang H.
    Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2023; 13():1170687. PubMed ID: 37168393.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was commonly applied given its ability to identify and type all infections without depending upon culture and to retrieve all DNA with unbiasedness. In this study, we strive to compare outcomes of mNGS with conventional culture methods in adults with sepsis, investigate the differences between the immunocompromised and control group, and assess the clinical effects of mNGS. METHODS: In our study, 308 adult sepsis patients were included. We used both mNGS and conventional culture methods to analyze diagnostic results, pathogens, and sample types. The correlation between some laboratory tests and the frequency of pathogens by groups was also analyzed. Furthermore, the clinical impacts of mNGS were estimated. RESULTS: 308 samples were assigned to an immunocompromised group (92/308,29.9%) and a control group (216/308,70.1%). There was the sensitivity of mNGS considered greater than that of the culture method in all samples (88.0% vs 26.3%; P <​ 0.001), in the immunocompromised group (91.3% vs 26.1%; P <​ 0.001), and the control group (86.6% vs 26.4%; P <​ 0.001), particularly in all sample types of blood (P <​ 0.001), BALF (P <​ 0.001), CSF (P <​ 0.001), sputum (P <​ 0.001) and ascitic fluid (P = 0.008). When examining the mNGS results between groups, Pneumocystis jirovecii (P < 0.001), Mucoraceae (P = 0.014), and Klebsiella (P = 0.045) all showed significant differences. On the whole, mNGS detected more pathogens than culture methods (111 vs 25), found 89 organisms that were continuously overlooked in entire samples by culture methods, and showed a favorable positive clinical effect in 76.3% (235 of 308) of patients. In 185 (60.1%) patients, mNGS prompted a modification in the course of management, which included antibiotic de-escalation in 61(19.8%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The research discovered that mNGS was more sensitive than the culture method, particularly in samples of blood, BALF, CSF, sputum, and ascitic fluid. When examining the mNGS results, Pneumocystis jirovecii and Mucoraceae were the pathogens seen more commonly in immunocompromised patients with sepsis, which required more attention from clinicians. There was a substantial benefit of mNGS in enhancing the diagnosis of sepsis and advancing patient treatment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]