MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Comparisons of different lymph node staging systems for predicting overall survival of node-positive patients with renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.
Author: Zheng W, Jiang W, Wu Q, Chen J, Zhang Z, Yu S, Guo C.
Journal: BMJ Open; 2023 Apr 26; 13(4):e068044. PubMed ID: 37185648.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: To compare the prognostic values of three lymph node staging systems in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including the number of positive lymph nodes (NPLN), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 1904 patients with pathological N1 RCC, diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 and underwent nephrectomy combined with lymph node dissection, were identified from the SEER database. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome of this study was overall survival (OS). Restricted cubic spline functions and multivariable Cox regression analyses were employed to characterise the associations of OS with NPLN, LNR and LODDS, respectively. RESULTS: Data of 1904 eligible RCC patients were extracted from the SEER database. The mortality risks of RCC patients increased with the increasing of NPLN, LNR and LODDS. NPLN (NPLN3 vs NPLN1, HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43, p=0.001), LNR (LNR3 vs LNR1, HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.67, p<0.001; LNR2 vs LNR1, HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.50, p=0.002) and LODDS (LODDS3 vs LODDS1, HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.72, p<0.001; LODDS2 vs LODDS1, HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.53, p<0.001) were all independent prognostic factors of OS. The predictive abilities of LNR (Akaike information criterion, AIC: 19576.3, optimism-corrected C-index: 0.677) and LODDS (AIC: 19579.2, optimism-corrected C-index: 0.676) were comparable, superior to NPLN (AIC: 19603.7, optimism-corrected C-index: 0.673). In subgroup analyses, the LODDS classification could better stratify survival of RCC patients, in particular for those with the number of dissected lymph nodes <13 or NPLN≤2. CONCLUSIONS: NPLN, LNR and LODDS were all independent predictors of OS in RCC. When compared with NPLN and LNR, LODDS had a better performance in survival prediction and risk stratification. The three metrics all had the potential to be integrated into future versions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]