These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use, misuse, and overuse of antenatal corticosteroids. A retrospective cohort study.
    Author: Cojocaru L, Chakravarthy S, Tadbiri H, Reddy R, Ducey J, Fruhman G.
    Journal: J Perinat Med; 2023 Oct 26; 51(8):1046-1051. PubMed ID: 37216498.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the timing of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration in relation to the delivery timing based on indications and risk factors for preterm delivery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to understand what factors predict the optimal timing of ACS administration (ACS administration within seven days). We reviewed consecutive charts of adult pregnant women receiving ACS from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. We excluded pregnancies under 23 weeks, incomplete and duplicate records, and patients delivered outside our health system. The timing of ACS administration was categorized as optimal or suboptimal. These groups were analyzed regarding demographics, indications for ACS administration, risk factors for preterm delivery, and signs and symptoms of preterm labor. RESULTS: We identified 25,776 deliveries. ACS were administered to 531 pregnancies, of which 478 met the inclusion criteria. Of the 478 pregnancies included in the study, 266 (55.6 %) were delivered in the optimal timeframe. There was a higher proportion of patients receiving ACS for the indication of threatened preterm labor in the suboptimal group as compared to the optimal group (85.4 % vs. 63.5 %, p<0.001). In addition, patients who delivered in the suboptimal timeframe had a higher proportion of short cervix (33 % vs. 6.4 %, p<0.001) and positive fetal fibronectin (19.8 % vs. 1.1 %, p<0.001) compared to those who delivered in the optimal timeframe. CONCLUSIONS: More emphasis should be placed on the judicious use of ACS. Emphasis should be placed on clinical assessment rather than relying solely on imaging and laboratory tests. Re-appraisal of institutional practices and thoughtful ACS administration based on the risk-benefit ratio is warranted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]