These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study.
    Author: Shi R, Wang G, Chen Z, Yuan L, Zhou T, Tan H.
    Journal: J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jul 05; 18(1):481. PubMed ID: 37403163.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Osteochondral injury is a common sports injury, and hyaline cartilage does not regenerate spontaneously when injured. However, there is currently no gold standard for treating osteochondral defects. Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is widely used in clinical practice and is best used to treat small osteochondral lesions in the knee that are < 2 cm2 in size. Autologous dual-tissue transplantation (ADTT) is a promising method with wider indications for osteochondral injuries; however, ADTT has not been evaluated in many studies. This study aimed to compare the radiographic and histological results of ADTT and OAT for treating osteochondral defects in a porcine model. METHODS: Osteochondral defects were made in the bilateral medial condyles of the knees of 12 Dian-nan small-ear pigs. The 24 knees were divided into the ADTT group (n = 8), OAT group (n = 8), and empty control group (n = 8). At 2 and 4 months postoperatively, the knees underwent gross evaluation based on the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score, radiographic assessment based on CT findings and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score, and histological evaluation based on the O'Driscoll histological score of the repair tissue. RESULTS: At 2 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score were significantly better in the OAT group than the ADTT group (all P < 0.05). At 4 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score tended to be better in the OAT group than the ADTT group, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, ADTT and OAT are both effective treatments for osteochondral defects in weight bearing areas. ADTT may be useful as an alternative procedure to OAT for treating osteochondral defects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]