These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Mixtures of urinary concentrations of phenols and phthalate biomarkers in relation to the ovarian reserve among women attending a fertility clinic. Author: Génard-Walton M, McGee G, Williams PL, Souter I, Ford JB, Chavarro JE, Calafat AM, Hauser R, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Earth Study Team. Journal: Sci Total Environ; 2023 Nov 10; 898():165536. PubMed ID: 37453702. Abstract: Although prior studies have found associations of the ovarian reserve with urinary concentrations of some individual phenols and phthalate metabolites, little is known about the potential associations of these chemicals as a mixture with the ovarian reserve. We investigated whether mixtures of four urinary phenols (bisphenol A, butylparaben, methylparaben, propylparaben) and eight metabolites of five phthalate diesters including di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were associated with markers of the ovarian reserve among 271 women attending a fertility center who enrolled in the Environment and Reproductive Health study (2004-2017). The analysis was restricted to one outcome per study participant using the earliest outcome after the last exposure assessment. Ovarian reserve markers included lower antral follicle count (AFC) defined as AFC < 7, circulating serum levels of day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) assessed by immunoassays, and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) defined as either AFC < 7, FSH > 10 UI/L or primary infertility diagnosis of DOR. We applied Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) and quantile g-computation to estimate the joint associations and assess the interactions between chemical exposure biomarkers on the markers of the ovarian reserve while adjusting for confounders. Among all 271 women, 738 urine samples were collected. In quantile g-computation models, a quartile increase in the exposure biomarkers mixture was not significantly associated with lower AFC (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.52, 2.30), day 3 FSH levels (Beta = 0.30, 95 % CI = -0.32, 0.93) or DOR (OR = 1.02, 95 % CI = 0.52, 2.05). Similarly, BKMR did not show any evidence of associations between the mixture and any of the studied outcomes, or interactions between chemicals. Despite the lack of associations, these results need to be explored among women in other study cohorts.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]