These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Deep Learning for Inference of Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction From T1-Weighted In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MRI: Retrospective Analysis of Population-Based Trial Data.
    Author: Wang K, Cunha GM, Hasenstab K, Henderson WC, Middleton MS, Cole SA, Umans JG, Ali T, Hsiao A, Sirlin CB.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Nov; 221(5):620-631. PubMed ID: 37466189.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND. The confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) sequence used to determine proton density fat fraction (PDFF) for hepatic fat quantification is not widely available. As an alternative, hepatic fat can be assessed by a two-point Dixon method to calculate signal fat fraction (FF) from conventional T1-weighted in- and opposed-phase (IOP) images, although signal FF is prone to biases, leading to inaccurate quantification. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare hepatic fat quantification by use of PDFF inferred from conventional T1-weighted IOP images and deep-learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with quantification by use of two-point Dixon signal FF with CSE-MRI PDFF as the reference standard. METHODS. This study entailed retrospective analysis of data from 292 participants (203 women, 89 men; mean age, 53.7 ± 12.0 [SD] years) enrolled at two sites from September 1, 2017, to December 18, 2019, in the Strong Heart Family Study (a prospective population-based study of American Indian communities). Participants underwent liver MRI (site A, 3 T; site B, 1.5 T) including T1-weighted IOP MRI and CSE-MRI (used to reconstruct CSE PDFF and CSE R2* maps). With CSE PDFF as reference, a CNN was trained in a random sample of 218 (75%) participants to infer voxel-by-voxel PDFF maps from T1-weighted IOP images; testing was performed in the other 74 (25%) participants. Parametric values from the entire liver were automatically extracted. Per-participant median CNN-inferred PDFF and median two-point Dixon signal FF were compared with reference median CSE-MRI PDFF by means of linear regression analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. The code is publicly available at github.com/kang927/CNN-inference-of-PDFF-from-T1w-IOP-MR. RESULTS. In the 74 test-set participants, reference CSE PDFF ranged from 1% to 32% (mean, 11.3% ± 8.3% [SD]); reference CSE R2* ranged from 31 to 457 seconds-1 (mean, 62.4 ± 67.3 seconds-1 [SD]). Agreement metrics with reference to CSE PDFF for CNN-inferred PDFF were ICC = 0.99, bias = -0.19%, 95% limits of agreement (LoA) = (-2.80%, 2.71%) and for two-point Dixon signal FF were ICC = 0.93, bias = -1.11%, LoA = (-7.54%, 5.33%). CONCLUSION. Agreement with reference CSE PDFF was better for CNN-inferred PDFF from conventional T1-weighted IOP images than for two-point Dixon signal FF. Further investigation is needed in individuals with moderate-to-severe iron overload. CLINICAL IMPACT. Measurement of CNN-inferred PDFF from widely available T1-weighted IOP images may facilitate adoption of hepatic PDFF as a quantitative bio-marker for liver fat assessment, expanding opportunities to screen for hepatic steatosis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]