These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The impact of fasciotomy on inpatient outcomes in lower leg fracture management.
    Author: Mittlmeier AS, Pape HC, Neuhaus V, Canal C.
    Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):363-369. PubMed ID: 37535098.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: While lower extremity fractures are common injuries, concomitant compartment syndrome can lead to significant implications and surgical release (fasciotomy) is essential. The aim of this study was to identify potential predictors of compartment release and risk factors related to complications. Using a large nationwide cohort, this study compared patients suffering from lower extremity fractures with and without compartment syndrome during their primary in-hospital stay following trauma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the prospective surgical registry of the working group for quality assurance in surgery in Switzerland, which collects data from nearly 85% of all institutions involved in trauma surgery. Inclusion criteria Patients who underwent surgical treatment for tibia and/or fibula fractures between January 2012 and December 2022 were included in the study. Statistics Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and t test. Furthermore, a regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent risk factors for fasciotomy and related complications. In the present study, a p value less than 0.001 was determined to indicate statistical significance due to the large sample size. RESULTS: The total number of cases analyzed was 1784, of which 98 underwent fasciotomies and 1686 did not undergo the procedure. Patients with fasciotomies were identified as significantly younger (39 vs. 43 years old) and mostly male (85% vs. 64%), with a significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (ASA III 10% vs. 6%) and significantly more comorbidities (30% vs. 20%). These patients had significantly longer duration of surgeries (136 vs. 102 min). Furthermore, the total number of surgical interventions, the rate of antibiotic treatment, and related complications were significantly higher in the fasciotomy group. Sex, age, comorbidities, and fracture type (both bones fractured) were identified as relevant predictors for fasciotomy, while ASA class was the only predictor for in-hospital complications. Outcomes Patients who underwent fasciotomy had a significantly longer hospital stay (18 vs. 9 days) and a higher complication rate (42% vs. 6%) compared to those without fasciotomy. While fasciotomy may have played a role, other factors such as variations in patient characteristics and injury mechanisms may also contribute. Additionally, in-house mortality was found to be 0.17%, with no patient death recorded for the fasciotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Fasciotomy is vital. The knowledge about the further course is, however, helpful in resource allocation. We found significant differences between patients with and without fasciotomy in terms of age, sex, complication rate, length of stay, comorbidities, duration of operations, and use of antibiotics during their primary in-hospital stay. While the severity of the underlying trauma could not be modulated, awareness of the most relevant predictors for fasciotomy and related complications might help mitigate severe consequences and avoid adverse outcomes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]