These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Prophylactic central neck dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: is there any difference between western countries and China? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Author: Yang J, Han Y, Min Y, Chen C, Chen J, Xiang K, Liao J, Feng Y, Hu D, Yin G. Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1176512. PubMed ID: 37576962. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recommendations for the performance of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in patients with clinically node-uninvolved (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) are not the same. This meta-analysis set out to compare the effectiveness of pCND with total thyroidectomy (TT) in different countries and regions, mainly between western countries and China. METHODS: The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published until August 2022. The incidence rate of cervical lymph node metastases (LNMs), locoregional recurrences (LRRs), and postoperative complications were pooled by a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses based on different countries and regions were performed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 5,346 patients were analyzed. In the subgroup of western countries, patients undergoing pCND with TT had a significantly lower LRR rate [69/1,804, 3.82% vs. 139/2,541, 5.47%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.85] and a higher rate of temporary hypoparathyroidism (HPT) (316/1,279, 24.71% vs. 194/1,467, 13.22%; OR = 2.23; 95% CI 1.61-3.08) than that of the TT alone group, while no statistically significant difference was found in the rate of permanent HPT and temporary and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury. In the Chinese subgroup, the pCND with TT group had a significantly higher incidence rate of both temporary HPT (87/374, 23.26% vs. 36/324, 11.11%; OR = 2.24; 95% CI 1.32-3.81) and permanent HPT (21/374, 5.61% vs. 4/324, 1.23%; OR = 3.58; 95% CI = 1.24-10.37) than that of the TT alone group, while no significant difference was detected in the rate of LRR and temporary and permanent RLN injury. CONCLUSION: Compared with the TT alone for cN0 PTC patients, pCND with TT had a significantly lower LRR rate while having a higher temporary HPT rate in Europe, America, and Australia; however, it showed no significant difference in decreasing LRR rate while having a significantly raised rate of temporary and permanent HPT in China. More population-based results are required to advocate precision medicine in PTC. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022358546.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]