These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Midwife-led pandemic telemedicine services for maternal health and gender-based violence screening in Bangladesh: an implementation research case study.
    Author: Islam A, Begum F, Williams A, Basri R, Ara R, Anderson R.
    Journal: Reprod Health; 2023 Aug 29; 20(1):128. PubMed ID: 37644451.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted maternal and newborn health services in Bangladesh, exacerbating the large gaps in service utilization that existed prior to the pandemic. As part of its response, Bangladesh initiated remote antenatal and postnatal care telemedicine services led by midwives in 36 sub-district hospitals across five of Bangladesh's 64 districts. Gender-based violence screening and referral were integrated into the service to address a reported rise in violence following the country's pandemic lockdown. METHODS: Mixed-methods implementation research was used to develop an intrinsic case study describing the design and implementation of the telemedicine program. Qualitative analysis comprised document review, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. Quantitative analysis employed an interrupted time series analysis with segmented multi-variate regression to compare maternity care service use trends before and after implementation. Poisson regression analysis was used to examine the trend in number of gender-based violence remote screenings, sessions held, and cases identified. RESULTS: A statistically significant change in trend for onsite antenatal and postpartum care as well as women seeking care at the hospital as a result of postpartum hemorrhage arising in the community was observed following the introduction of telemedicine. Facility births and cases of eclampsia appropriately identified and managed also had significant increases. In addition, over 6917 women were screened for GBV, 223 received counseling and 34 referrals were made, showing a statistically significant increase in frequency over time following the implementation of the telemedicine program. Challenges included that not all midwives adopted GBV screening, some women were reluctant to discuss GBV, there was an unanticipated need to introduce a patient visit scheduling system in all intervention hospitals, and many women were not reachable by phone due to lack of access or network coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal health and gender-based violence telemedicine led by midwives was an effective, low-cost intervention in Bangladesh for addressing pandemic and pre-pandemic gaps in service use. Other low and middle-income countries planning to implement remote maternal health interventions via midwives should consider whether a patient visit scheduling system needs to be introduced, as well as limitations around mobile phone access and connectivity. Future research should include care quality oversight and improvement, and a more well-informed strategy for facilitating effective GBV screening. To support the continuation of sexual and reproductive health services following pandemic lockdowns, Bangladesh introduced a midwife-led telemedicine program. Through the program, midwives who were already employed within the health system delivered remote antenatal and postnatal care, including gender-based violence screening and referral. The program operated in 36 sub-district hospitals across five of Bangladesh’s 64 districts. Intrinsic implementation research was used to develop a case study describing the design and implementation of the telemedicine program. Qualitative and quantitative methods comprised document review, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and service use trends. Analysis of the data identified a statistically significant trend increase for most maternity care services. Although they did increase significantly over time, referrals for GBV were less than expected, which may have been related to some midwives not screening for GBV, and/or that many women were reluctant to discuss GBV. In addition, there was an unanticipated need to introduce a patient visit scheduling system in all intervention hospitals, and many women were not reachable by phone due to lack of access or network coverage. In spite of this, 6197 women were screened for GBV. Of those, 223 received counseling and 34 received referrals. Overall, telemedicine led by midwives was an effective, low-cost intervention for maternal health, and a step toward stronger GBV response in Bangladesh. Other low and middle-income countries planning to implement remote maternal health interventions via midwives should consider what is needed to facilitate comfort for both providers and women as related to GBV screening, as well as practical issues regarding introducing scheduling systems and limitations of mobile phone access and connectivity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]