These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Exploring the Efficacy of Intervertebral Fusion and Nucleus Pulposus Removal in Treating Various Grades of Disc Herniation and Assessing the Significance of Lumbar Spine Rehabilitation Care.
    Author: Ji C, Zhang R, Liang Y, Jia G, Hai Y, Jia Y, Tang J.
    Journal: Altern Ther Health Med; 2023 Nov; 29(8):576-581. PubMed ID: 37678857.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of various grades of intervertebral disc herniation (IDH) and evaluate the added value of incorporating McKenzie therapy-based lumbar spine rehabilitation care. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients diagnosed with IDH admitted to our hospital between May 2020 and June 2022. Among these patients, 43 underwent PLIF (PLIF group), while the remaining 40 received PTED treatment (PTED group). Parameters such as operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospitalization duration, Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured in both groups before and after the procedures. Additionally, 74 IDH patients were randomly assigned to either a research group receiving McKenzie therapy (n = 37) or a control group receiving standard care (n = 37). VAS and ODI scores were recorded pre- and post-intervention in both groups, and lumbar forward flexion joint range of motion (ROM) was assessed. RESULTS: The PTED group demonstrated shorter operative times, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and shorter hospital stays compared to the PLIF group (P < .05). One month after surgery, no significant differences in VAS and ODI were observed between the PLIF and PTED group patients with Pfirrmann class II-III herniation (P > .05). However, Pfirrmann class IV patients in the PLIF group exhibited lower VAS and ODI scores compared to those in the PTED group (P < .05). Following rehabilitation care, the research group exhibited lower VAS and ODI scores and greater ROM compared to the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: PTED is characterized by reduced surgical trauma, shorter operative duration, and decreased intraoperative bleeding, while PLIF offers complete removal of the affected disc and stable intervertebral fusion. Integrating McKenzie therapy-based rehabilitation care further enhances lumbar spine function and alleviates pain in patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]