These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of measured and treatment planning system out-of-field dose for a 1.5 T MR linac.
    Author: Powers M, Baines J.
    Journal: Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct 02; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37699399.
    Abstract:
    Objective.Dose due to the electron streaming effect (ESE) is a significant contribution to out-of-field dose on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac. The aim of this work is to provide a systematic comparison of calculated and measured streaming dose for this system.Approach.Beams 1.0 × 1.0 cm2to 5.0 × 5.0 cm2, gantry 90.0°, 1000 MU, were incident on an in-house phantom. At the beam entrance and exit surfaces of the phantom, ESE was generated in theY-direction (IEC 61217). EBT3 film, orientated within theX-Zplane and at 14.0 mm depth in a solid water block, was used to determine ESE dose 5.0 cm beyond the phantom. The experimental arrangement was simulated in the Monaco v5.4 treatment planning system (TPS), utilising a CT phantom dataset with differing relative electron densities (RED) for the surrounding air. Horizontal (Xdirection) and vertical (Zdirection) film dose profiles were compared to the corresponding TPS profiles.Main results. For each field, the maximum ESE dose was observed at the beam exit, the magnitude of which decreases with decreasing field size. For the 5.0 × 5.0 cm2field, the exit and entry ESE doses were 19.6% and 7.0% of theDmaxdose to water, respectively. Across horizontal profiles, differences (simulated-measured) were reduced with smaller fields and lower RED. The maximum absolute profile difference was 1.7% of theDmaxdose to water for optimal RED and isocentre location. In vertical profiles an offset consistent with the Lorentz force was observed relative to theX-Yisoplane.Significance. For the fields investigated, maximum absolute differences (simulated-measured) ≤ 5.2% occurred in peak regions of ESE, at the beam entrance and exit from the phantom. Generally, there is good agreement between Monaco simulated and measured ESE. Simulated out-of-field dose is sensitive to the RED assigned to air structures and unforced RED optimises out-of-field dose calculation accuracy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]