These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Feasibility and Implementation of a 4D Free-Breathing Variable Density Stack-of-Stars Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography in Young Children Without Sedation.
    Author: Spogis J, Katemann C, Zhang S, Esser M, Tsiflikas I, Schäfer J.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 2024 Mar 01; 59(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 37707861.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance urography (MRU) is well established in the diagnostic workup of urinary tract anomalies in children, providing comprehensive morphological and functional information. However, dynamic contrast-enhanced images acquired in the standard Cartesian k-space manner are prone to motion artifacts. A newly introduced 4D high spatiotemporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging based on variable density elliptical centric radial stack-of-stars sharing technique has shown improved image quality regarding motions under free breathing. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to implement this 4D free-breathing sequence for functional MRU and to compare its image quality and analyzability with standard breath-hold Cartesian MRU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all functional 4D MRU performed without general anesthesia between September 2021 and December 2022 and compared them with matched pairs (age, affected kidney, diagnosis) of standard Cartesian MRU between 2016 and 2022. Image analysis was performed by 2 radiologists independently regarding the following criteria using a 4-point Likert scale, with 4 being the best: overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, respiratory motion artifacts, as well as sharpness and contrast of aorta, kidneys, and ureters. We also measured vertical kidney motion due to respiratory motion and compared the variance for each kidney using F test. Finally, both radiologists calculated the volume, split renal volume (vDRF), split renal Patlak function (pDRF), and split renal function considering the volume and Patlak function (vpDRF) for each kidney. Values were compared using Bland-Altman plots and F test. RESULTS: Forty children (20 for 4D free-breathing and standard breath-hold, respectively) were enrolled. Ten children of each group were examined using feed-and-sleep technique (median age: 4D, 3.3 months; standard, 4.2 months), 10 were awake (median age: 4D, 8.9 years; standard, 8.6 years). Overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, respiratory motion artifacts, as well as sharpness and contrast of the aorta, kidneys, and ureters were rated significantly better for 4D free-breathing compared with standard breath-hold by both readers ( P ranging from <0.0001 to 0.005). Vertical kidney motion was significantly reduced in 4D free-breathing for the right and the left kidney (both P < 0.001). There was a significantly smaller variance concerning the differences between the 2 readers for vpDRF in 4D MRU ( P = 0.0003). In contrast, no significant difference could be demonstrated for volume ( P = 0.05), vDRF ( P = 0.93), and pDRF ( P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility of applying a 4D free-breathing variable density stack-of-stars imaging for functional MRU in young pediatric patients with improved image quality, fewer motion artifacts, and improved functional analyzability.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]