These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Role of EEG monitoring and cross-clamping duration in carotid endarterectomy.
    Author: Collice M, Arena O, Fontana RA, Mola M, Galbiati N.
    Journal: J Neurosurg; 1986 Dec; 65(6):815-9. PubMed ID: 3772480.
    Abstract:
    The usefulness of electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring as well as the significance of the period of cross clamping in carotid endarterectomy have not been completely defined. In particular, the clinical importance of major EEG changes has not been fully investigated and some recent studies seem to indicate that the method has little value. As to the duration of cross clamping, there is strong evidence that occlusion times of about 15 minutes are tolerated under general anesthesia, but no information is available regarding longer periods of occlusion. The authors describe a consecutive series of 141 carotid endarterectomies in which the patients with EEG changes were shunted only when occlusion was anticipated to last longer than 30 minutes. Early major EEG changes (during the first 4 minutes) occurred in 14% of the cases. In the absence of EEG changes, long occlusion periods of 40 to 50 minutes were well tolerated. In contrast, the 20 patients with major persistent EEG changes did not tolerate protracted occlusion and three of them had immediate postoperative neurological complications. It seems that, in these circumstances, the incidence of neurological deficit is a function of the duration of cross clamping: these three patients had undergone occlusion for 15 to 30 minutes. Their deficits partially resolved. On the basis of these results it is concluded that: EEG recording is a reliable monitoring system in carotid artery cross clamping. No major strokes due to temporary carotid artery occurred in the series. The clinical significance of major persistent EEG changes is not negligible. Cross clamping for longer than 15 minutes in the presence of significant EEG alterations is potentially dangerous.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]