These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of four surgical methods for pediatric forearm double diaphyseal fractures: a retrospective analysis.
    Author: Guzel I.
    Journal: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Oct; 27(19):9058-9066. PubMed ID: 37843319.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: One of the most frequent fractures in children is a double forearm fracture. They make up 26% of children's long bone fractures in the upper extremities and their incidence has increased in recent years. In this study, pediatric patients with double forearm fractures were treated using plate screw, intramedullary K-wire (I-KW), intramedullary titanium elastic nails (TENs), and hybrid fixation (HF) to compare the radiographic and functional results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The printed and digital medical records were retrospectively examined from our hospital's archives after receiving consent from the regional ethics committee. Legal guardians of the patients, who were under the age of 18, gave their informed consent. Based on the surgical procedure used, the patients were split into 4 groups. Double plating was the D-P group, hybrid fixation method was the HF group, intramedullary elastic titanium nail was the TEN group, and intramedullary K-wire was the I-KW group. The study comprised 78 patients in total, with 19 patients in the HF group, 21 patients in the TEN group, 20 patients in the I-KW group, and 18 patients in the D-P group. RESULTS: When the mean operating times of the four approaches were compared, a substantial difference was found. The D-P group's mean operating time (65.2±4.9 minutes) was noticeably longer than those of the other groups (p<0.001). The HF group's mean operating time was 55.93.4 min longer than that of the TENs and I-KW groups, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). In comparison to the other groups, the D-P group's mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time was considerably shorter (6±3 sec) (p<0.001). When compared to the D-P group, it was considerably higher in the HF group (12±2 sec) (p<0.001). In comparison to the TENs (20±4 sec) and I-KW groups (19±5 sec), it was significantly lower in the HF group (p<0.001). In comparison to the HF group, the D-P group's tourniquet use lasted much longer (p<0.001). The TENs and I-KW groups did not use a tourniquet because a mini-incision was made. The D-P group's mean blood loss (110±10 ml) was substantially larger than that of the other groups (p<0.001) in the mean blood loss data. In comparison to the TENs (40±5 ml) and I-KW (40±5 ml) groups, the mean blood loss in the HF group (90±10 ml) was considerably larger (p<0.001). All patients received an above-elbow postoperative cast. The HF group (2 weeks) and the D-P group (2 weeks) experienced significantly less postoperative immobility than the TENs and I-KW groups (4.4 weeks, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The four fixation techniques used in the current study for juvenile diaphyseal double forearm fractures produced positive clinical and functional outcomes. The hybrid fixation technique was discovered to be comparable to the other techniques and even beneficial in some ways. So, a safe and efficient treatment option for juvenile diaphyseal double forearm fractures is hybrid fixation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]