These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Myocardial Work Appraisal in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Author: de Gregorio C, Trimarchi G, Faro DC, De Gaetano F, Campisi M, Losi V, Zito C, Tamburino C, Di Bella G, Monte IP. Journal: Am J Cardiol; 2023 Dec 01; 208():173-179. PubMed ID: 37852127. Abstract: Global left ventricular (LV) myocardial work (MW) indexes can be recognized at ultrasound imaging from the LV pressure/global longitudinal strain (GLS) loop analysis. A total of 4 indexes, global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE), have been demonstrated to overcome the methodological limitations of GLS and provide useful information on myocardial dysfunction in some clinical settings. Although impaired MW indexes have been demonstrated in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) or with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), there are no comparative studies at present. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of MW in both these clinical settings compared with patients with well-controlled hypertension (HTN). A total of 83 patients, 32 with ATTR (aged 70 ± 11 years, 32% mutated, 68% wild-type, 72% men), 29 with HCM (aged 57 ± 17 years), and 22 HTN controls (aged 56 ± 5.6 years, 59% men) were prospectively enrolled at 2 clinical centers. All participants had New York Heart Association class I or II. Overall, the LV mass index was greater in both study groups than in HTN, whereas the LV ejection fraction (EF) was significantly lower in ATTR compared with other groups. Based on this finding, patients with ATTR were further divided into 2 subgroups: ATTR1 (LVEF ≤0.50), n = 14 (44%) and ATTR2 (LVEF >0.50), n = 18 (56%). Overall, the GWI and GCW were lower in all ATTR patients (mostly in ATTR1) than in the other groups (p <0.001), whereas only small differences in GWE and none in GWW were found among the groups. Of interest, the pairwise comparison and receiver operating characteristic analysis in preserved LVEF patients showed that GWI was a better discriminator of ATTR2 from HCM patients than GLS, with the cut-off value ≤1,419 mm Hg% (89% sensitivity; 55% specificity; p = 0.013). In conclusion, MW analysis was confirmed to be a modern way to investigate myocardial function in patients with hypertrophic phenocopies. GWI and GCW were more impaired in patients with ATTR compared with HCM and HTN controls. Furthermore, this study likely revealed an additional discriminative value of GWI over GLS alone in preserved LVEF settings.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]