These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predicting diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcomes with lesion-to-liver maximum standardized uptake value for interim-treatment and end-of-treatment positron emission tomography-computed tomography.
    Author: Wang L, Zhang S, Xin J.
    Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Oct 01; 13(10):6789-6800. PubMed ID: 37869355.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) has been used in response evaluation systems for malignant lymphomas and is an important tool for determining efficacy and prognosis. The Deauville 5-point scale (D-5PS) is an 18F-FDG PET-CT image-interpretation protocol for patients with lymphoma. Nevertheless, a number of limitations in visual image interpretation, such as interobserver disagreement and the increase of false-positive results, suggests that new parameters are needed. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic values of interim-treatment (I-) and end-of-treatment (EOT) PET-CT by comparing D-5PS to the semiquantitative lesion-to-liver maximum standardized uptake value ratio (RLL). METHODS: A total of 90 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (45 I-PET and 45 EOT-PET) were analyzed, and the RLL was calculated. Patients were additionally evaluated using the D-5PS system. We determined the optimal cutoff value of RLL using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the outcome predictions, while multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictive factors. RESULTS: Among the patients examined, 41 (20 I-PET and 21 EOT-PET) experienced progression, and 49 (25 I-PET, 24 EOT-PET) did not. The optimal cutoff values of the RLL for predicting disease progression were 1.37 for I-PET (sensitivity 75%, specificity 88%) and 2.03 for EOT-PET (sensitivity 45.5%, specificity 100%), while the cutoffs of the D-5PS were scores 4 for I-PET (sensitivity 80%, specificity 72%) and 5 for EOT-PET (sensitivity 40.9%, specificity 100%). The prognostic efficacy was higher for the RLL at interim than for the D-5PS [area under the curve (AUC) =0.848 vs. 0.741]. The EOT prognostic efficacy of both evaluation methods was essentially equivalent (AUC =0.785 vs. 0.725). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that RLL and D-5PS were independent factors affecting DLBCL outcomes for both interim and EOT assessment. CONCLUSIONS: RLL and D-5PS have independent predictive values for the interim and EOT evaluation of outcomes in patients with DLBCL. The RLL has better interim predictive ability than does D-5PS and can optimize D-5PS interpretation, thus improving interim outcome prediction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]