These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Large-needle thyroid biopsy: still necessary. Author: Broughan TA, Esselstyn CB. Journal: Surgery; 1986 Dec; 100(6):1138-41. PubMed ID: 3787471. Abstract: Fine-needle aspiration and large-needle biopsy allow 87% of patients with nodular thyroid disease to avoid operation. We have been concerned that fine-needle aspiration used alone will miss a significant number of follicular neoplasms. Between January 1980 and April 1985, 46 patients had fine-needle aspiration, large-needle biopsy, and thyroidectomy, and the preoperative biopsy specimens suggested or the postoperative pathologic findings confirmed a follicular neoplasm. Seventeen patients had a thyroid carcinoma. All 17 patients also had hypercellular large-needle biopsies, but only nine of these patients had a fine-needle aspiration suspicious of malignancy (p = 0.0078). The inability of fine-needle aspiration to detect a significant number of thyroid cancers emphasizes the need to concomitantly perform large-needle biopsies in all acceptable cases.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]