These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [In vitro Activity of Rifabutin and Clofazimine to Macrolide-Resistant Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Clinical Isolates].
    Author: Sürücüoğlu S, Özkütük N, Gazi H, Çavuşoğlu C.
    Journal: Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Oct; 57(4):639-649. PubMed ID: 37885391.
    Abstract:
    Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC) is one of the most resistant bacteria against antimicrobial agents. The number of agents that can be used by oral route, such as macrolides, is limited in antimicrobial therapy. In recent years, rifabutin and clofazimine have gained importance as they can be administered by oral route and have shown synergistic effects with macrolides and aminoglycosides. The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro activity of rifabutin and clofazimine against clinical isolates of MABSC resistant to macrolides. A total of 48 MABSC isolates obtained from respiratory tract and other clinical samples in the Tuberculosis Laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of Manisa Celal Bayar and Ege Universities were included in the study. Subspecies differentiation and aminoglycoside and macrolide resistance of the isolates were determined by GenoType NTM-DR test. Rifabutin and clofazimine susceptibilities were determined by standard broth microdilution method. Of the MABSC isolates 42 were identified as M.abscessus subsp. abscessus, three as M.abscessus subsp. bolletii and three as M.abscessus subsp. massiliense. None of the isolates exhibited rrs and rrl mutations indicating acquired macrolide resistance and aminoglycoside resistance. However, the erm(41) T28 genotype which is associated with inducible macrolide resistance was detected in 41 (85%) of the strains. All M.abscessus subsp. massiliense isolates were found to be genotypically susceptible to macrolides. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range values for rifabutin were 0.0625 to 32 µg/mL, while for clofazimine, the range was 0.0625 to 1 µg/mL. Rifabutin MIC values were significantly higher (mean 5.98 µg/mL vs 0.5 µg/mL, p= 0.026) in the isolates with macrolide resistance. There was no correlation between macrolide resistance and clofazimine MIC values (mean 0.25 µg/mL vs. 0.214 µg/mL, p= 0.758). The MIC50 and MIC90 values for rifabutin were 1 and 8 µg/mL, respectively, while for clofazimine they were 0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL. Macrolide resistance was found to be higher in isolates with rifabutin MIC values above the MIC50 value (p= 0.045). In conclusion, the determination of higher rifabutin MIC values in isolates resistant to macrolides suggested that susceptibility testing should be performed before adding rifabutin to the treatment regimen. The low MIC values of clofazimine in all strains indicated that it may be used as a first choice in the combination therapy. However, further studies using a larger number of clinical isolates and applying genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility tests are needed to determine threshold MIC values to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]