These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effect of cross-bridge clustering and head-head competition on the mechanical response of skeletal muscle under equilibrium conditions.
    Author: Tözeren A, Schoenberg M.
    Journal: Biophys J; 1986 Nov; 50(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 3790690.
    Abstract:
    The effect of cross-bridge clustering and head-head competition on the mechanical response of skeletal muscle under equilibrium conditions is considered. For this purpose, the recent multiple site equilibrium cross-bridge model of Schoenberg (Schoenberg, M., 1985, Biophys. J., 48:467-475) is extended in accordance with the formalism of T.L. Hill (1974, Prog. Biophys, Mol. Biol., 28:267-340) to consider the case where groups of independent cross-bridge heads compete with each other for binding to multiple actin sites. Cooperative behavior between heads is not allowed. Computations indicate that for the double-headed cross-bridge with two independent equivalent heads, the time course of force decay after a stretch is similar to that for the single-headed cross-bridge; that is, the rate constant for force decay is approximately equal to the cross-bridge head detachment rate constant. The results also show that the force decay after a stretch becomes slower than the detachment rate constant of a single head when cross-bridge heads bind adjacently in clusters so that competition between heads for binding to the available actin sites increases. However, if one assumes that the detachment rate constant of an unstrained head in a fiber is comparable to that of an S1 molecule in solution, this effect is not large enough to explain why some of the rate constants for force decay after a stretch in rigor, or in the presence of ATP analogues such as adenyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate, appear to be significantly slower than the detachment rate constant of S1 from actin in solution.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]