These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of image quality, contrast administration, and radiation doses in pediatric abdominal dual-layer detector dual-energy CT using propensity score matching analysis.
    Author: Kang Y, Hwang SH, Han K, Shin HJ.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2023 Dec; 169():111177. PubMed ID: 37944333.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the image quality, contrast administration, and radiation dose between single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) in pediatric patients. METHODS: From March to December 2021, children who underwent abdominal SECT or DECT were retrospectively included in this study. The DECT group received 10-30 % less contrast than the routine dose. CT images were obtained at hepatic venous phase using a routine reconstruction method (iDose4). DECT scans were additionally reconstructed with a virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 40 and 65 keV. Quantitative image evaluations compared the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver, portal vein, and pancreas. Qualitative analysis assessed degree of contrast enhancement, lesion or organ conspicuity, image noise, artificiality, and overall image quality. RESULTS: Among 318 patients, 112 (median age, 16 years; 56 in each group) were included after propensity score matching. Compared with the SECT group, DECT group with iDose4 demonstrated lower CNRs and SNRs, while VMI at 40 or 65 keV showed no significant difference. In qualitative analysis, iDose4 produced higher scores on artificiality, and VMI at 40 keV demonstrated superior contrast enhancement and lesion conspicuity in the DECT group. Overall image quality was higher with VMI 65 keV among the DECT patients, and there was no significant difference compared to SECT. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) did not differ significantly between the two groups (median, 2.8 mGy vs. 2.9 mGy; p = 0.802). The injected contrast volume was reduced by 10 % in the DECT group. CONCLUSION: Pediatric abdominal DECT with reduced contrast administration showed no significant differences in image quality and radiation dose compared to SECT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]