These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The Amputated Limb Gluteus Medius is Biomechanically Disadvantaged in Patients with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation.
    Author: Roda GF, Awad ME, Melton DH, Christiansen CL, Stoneback JW, Gaffney BMM.
    Journal: Ann Biomed Eng; 2024 Mar; 52(3):565-574. PubMed ID: 37946055.
    Abstract:
    Patients with transfemoral amputation (TFA) are at an increased risk of secondary musculoskeleteal comorbidities, primarily due to asymmetric joint loading. Amputated limb muscle weakness is also prevalent in the TFA population, yet all factors that contribute to muscle strength and thus joint loading are not well understood. Our objective was to bilaterally compare gluteus medius (GMED) muscle factors (volume, fatty infiltration, moment arm) that all contribute to joint loading in patients with TFA. Quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) images of the hip were collected from eight participants with unilateral TFA (2M/6F; age: 47.3 ± 14.7 y/o; BMI: 25.4 ± 5.3 kg/m2; time since amputation: 20.6 ± 15.0 years) and used to calculate normalized GMED muscle volume and fatty infiltration. Six participants participated in an instrumented gait analysis session that collected whole-body kinematics during overground walking. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were used to calculate bilateral GMED (anterior, middle, posterior) moment arms and frontal plane hip joint angles across three gait cycles. Differences in volume, fatty infiltration, hip adduction-abduction angle, and peak moment arms were compared between limbs using paired Cohen's d effect sizes. Volume was smaller by 36.3 ± 18.8% (d = 1.7) and fatty infiltration was greater by 6.4 ± 7.8% (d = 0.8) in the amputated limb GMED compared to the intact limb. The amputated limb GMED abduction moment arms were smaller compared to the intact limb for both overground walking (anterior: d = 0.9; middle: d = 0.1.2) and during normal range of motion (anterior: d = 0.8; middle: d = 0.8) while bilateral hip adduction-abduction angles were similar during overground walking (d = 0.5). These results indicate that in patients with TFA, the amputated limb GMED is biomechanically disadvantaged compared to the intact limb, which may contribute to the etiology of secondary comorbidities. This population might benefit from movement retraining to lengthen the amputated limb GMED abduction moment arm during gait.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]