MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
Author: Wang YM, Shang JW, Dong L, Liang LH, Zhao RZ, Liang C, Wang SQ, Xia W, Cheng G, Hua LX.
Journal: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov 23; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079.
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the relationship between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and the pathological results of transperineal magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion guided biopsy. Methods: The clinical data, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and prostate puncture biopsies of 517 patients who were assigned to PI-RADS score of 4 or 5 and underwent transperineal magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion guided biopsy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2019 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the PI-RADS 4 and PI-RADS 5 groups according to their PI-RADS scores and were stratified by their prostate specific antigen (PSA) values (PSA<10 ng/ml vs. PSA 10-20 ng/ml). The pathological negative rates from the biopsy, the distribution of the grade groups according to the grading system by World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP), the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa)between the groups were compared. Results: 369 patients with a PI-RADS score of 4 and 148 patients with a PI-RADS score of 5 were included in our research. The overall detection rates of PCa and CsPCa were 77.8% (402/517) and 66.7% (345/517), respectively. In the PI-RADS 4 group, patients with prostate negative biopsies or in WHO/ISUP 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 grade groups accounted for 28.2%, 12.7%, 20.1%, 17.1%, 18.4% and 3.5%, respectively, whereas in the PI-RADS 5 group the rates were 7.4%, 6.8%, 22.3%, 22.3%, 26.4%, and 14.9%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PI-RADS 4 group [71.8% (265/369) vs. 59.1% (218/369), P<0.001] were lower than those of the PI-RADS 5 group [92.6% (137/148) vs. 85.8% (127/148), P<0.001]. In the PI-RADS 4 group, the proportion of patients classified into WHO/ISUP 4-5 grade groups was lower than that of patients in the PI-RADS 5 group [22.0% (81/369) vs 41.2% (61/148) (P<0.001)]. The detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PSA<10 ng/ml stratification were less than that in the PSA 10-20 ng/ml stratification[74.1% (281/379) vs. 87.7% (121/138), P=0.001], and [60.9% (231/379) vs. 82.6% (114/138), P<0.001]. For patients with PSA<10 ng/ml, the detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PI-RADS 4 group were less than those in the PI-RADS5 group [70.9% (217/306) vs. 87.7% (64/73), P=0.003], and [56.2% (172/306) vs. 80.8% (59/73), P<0.001]. For those with a PSA value of 10-20 ng/ml, the detection rates of PCa and CsPCa in the PI-RADS 4 group were less than those in the PI-RADS 5 group [76.2% (48/63) vs. 97.3% (73/75), P<0.001], and [73.0% (46/63) vs. 90.7% (68/75), P=0.006]. There were statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients with prostate negative biopsy and those falling into WHO/ISUP grade groups 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 (P<0.001) between the PI-RADS 4 group and the PI-RADS 5 group in both stratifications. Conclusions: In this study, the detection rates of CsPCa and PCa in the PI-RADS 4 group were less than those in the PI-RADS 5 group. With the increase of PI-RADS scores, the detection rate of high-grade PCa increased. The same results held for patients with PSA<10 ng/ml or with PSA 10-20 ng/ml. 目的： 探究前列腺影像报告及资料系统(PI-RADS)评分与经会阴磁共振超声融合靶向活检病理结果的关系。 方法： 收集2019年6月至2022年3月于南京医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科行经会阴磁共振超声融合靶向穿刺活检的517例PI-RADS评分为4~5分患者的临床资料、MRI资料及前列腺穿刺活检病理结果。按PI-RADS评分将患者分为4分组(369例)和5分组(148例)，比较两组间前列腺穿刺活检病理阴性及世界卫生组织/国际泌尿系统病理学会(WHO/ISUP)分级的分布、前列腺癌检出率、临床有意义前列腺癌(CsPCa)检出率。 结果： 517例患者中，前列腺癌检出率为77.8%(402/517)，CsPCa检出率为66.7%(345/517)。PI-RADS评分4分组前列腺穿刺活检病理阴性及WHO/ISUP分级为1、2、3、4和5级患者分别有104例(28.2%)、47例(12.7%)、74例(20.1%)、63例(17.1%)、68例(18.4%)和13例(3.5%)，5分组分别有11例(7.4%)、10例(6.8%)、33例(22.3%)、33例(22.3%)、39例(26.4%)和22例(14.9%)，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。PI-RADS评分4分组前列腺癌检出率和CsPCa检出率分别为71.8%(265/369)和59.1%(218/369)，均低于5分组[92.6%(137/148)和85.8%(127/148)，均P<0.001]。PI-RADS评分4分组患者中，WHO/ISUP分级为4~5级的患者占22.0%(81/369)，低于5分组[41.2%(61/148)，P<0.001]。将517例患者按PSA分层后，在379例PSA<10 ng/ml的患者中，PI-RADS评分4分组和5分组前列腺穿刺活检病理阴性及WHO/ISUP分级为1、2、3、4和5级的分布差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)；PI-RADS评分4分组前列腺癌检出率和CsPCa检出率分别为70.9%(217/306)和56.2%(172/306)，均低于PI-RADS评分5分组[87.7%(64/73)和80.8%(59/73)；P＝0.003，P<0.001]。在138例PSA为10~20 ng/ml的患者中，PI-RADS评分4分组和5分组前列腺穿刺活检病理阴性及WHO/ISUP分级为1、2、3、4和5级的分布差异有统计学意义(P＝0.011)；PI-RADS评分4分组前列腺癌检出率和CsPCa检出率分别为76.2%(48/63)和73.0%(46/63)，均低于PI-RADS评分5分组[97.3%(73/75)和90.7%(68/75); P<0.001，P＝0.006]。 结论： PI-RADS评分4分患者行前列腺穿刺活检，其前列腺癌检出率和CsPCa检出率均低于PI-RADS评分5分患者，且随着PI-RADS评分升高WHO/ISUP分级高级别前列腺癌检出率越高。在PSA<10 ng/ml或10~20 ng/ml的患者中此结论同样成立。.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]