These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: MR Fingerprinting for Contrast Agent-free and Quantitative Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions.
    Author: Fujita S, Sano K, Cruz G, Velasco C, Kawasaki H, Fukumura Y, Yoneyama M, Suzuki A, Yamamoto K, Morita Y, Arai T, Fukunaga I, Uchida W, Kamagata K, Abe O, Kuwatsuru R, Saiura A, Ikejima K, Botnar R, Prieto C, Aoki S.
    Journal: Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2023 Nov; 5(6):e230036. PubMed ID: 37999629.
    Abstract:
    Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of liver MR fingerprinting (MRF) for quantitative characterization and diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Materials and Methods This single-site, prospective study included 89 participants (mean age, 62 years ± 15 [SD]; 45 women, 44 men) with various focal liver lesions who underwent MRI between October 2021 and August 2022. The participants underwent routine clinical MRI, non-contrast-enhanced liver MRF, and reference quantitative MRI with a 1.5-T MRI scanner. The bias and repeatability of the MRF measurements were assessed using linear regression, Bland-Altman plots, and coefficients of variation. The diagnostic capability of MRF-derived T1, T2, T2*, proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and a combination of these metrics to distinguish benign from malignant lesions was analyzed according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Liver MRF measurements showed moderate to high agreement with reference measurements (intraclass correlation = 0.94, 0.77, 0.45, and 0.61 for T1, T2, T2*, and PDFF, respectively), with underestimation of T2 values (mean bias in lesion = -0.5%, -29%, 5.8%, and -8.2% for T1, T2, T2*, and PDFF, respectively). The median coefficients of variation for repeatability of T1, T2, and T2* values were 2.5% (IQR, 3.6%), 3.1% (IQR, 5.6%), and 6.6% (IQR, 13.9%), respectively. After considering multicollinearity, a combination of MRF measurements showed a high diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant lesions (AUC = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.98]). Conclusion Liver MRF enabled the quantitative characterization of various focal liver lesions in a single breath-hold acquisition. Keywords: MR Imaging, Abdomen/GI, Liver, Imaging Sequences, Technical Aspects, Tissue Characterization, Technology Assessment, Diagnosis, Liver Lesions, MR Fingerprinting, Quantitative Characterization Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]