These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bioremediation of acid mine drainage using sulfate-reducing wetland bioreactor: Filling substrates influence, sulfide oxidation and microbial community.
    Author: Wang H, Zhang M, Dong P, Xue J, Liu L.
    Journal: Chemosphere; 2024 Feb; 349():140789. PubMed ID: 38013025.
    Abstract:
    Two sulfate-reducing wetland bioreactors (SRB-1 filled with lignocellulosic wastes and SRB-2 with river sand) were applied for synthetic acid mine drainage treatment with bio-waste fermentation liquid as electron donor, and the influence of filling substrates on sulfate reduction, sulfur transformation and microbial community was studied. The presence of lignocellulosic wastes (mixture of cow manure, bark, sawdust, peanut shell and straw) in SRB-1 promoted sulfate reduction efficiency (68.9%), sulfate reduction rate (42.1 ± 11 mg S/(L·d)), dissolved sulfide production rate (27.4 ± 7 mg S/(L·d)), and particularly caused high conversion ratio of sulfate reduction into dissolved sulfide (66.4%). In comparison, the relatively low sulfate reduction efficiency (42.9%), sulfate reduction rate (27.0 ± 10 mg S/(L·d)), dissolved sulfide production rate (5.6 ± 3 mg S/(L·d)) and low dissolved sulfide conversion efficiency (21.2%) occurred in SRB-2. Mixed organic substrates including easily assimilated electron donors (in manure) and lignocellulosic matter were effective to promote quick start and long-term microbial sulfate reduction. More than 98% of produced dissolved sulfide was oxidized dominantly by photoautotrophic green sulfur bacteria (genera Chlorobium and Chlorobaculum), of which 64.6% and 54.5% was converted into elemental sulfur for SRB-1 and SRB-2. The oxidation of sulfide into elemental sulfur for potential recovery rather than sulfate is preferred. Diverse sulfate reducing bacteria and sulfide oxidizing bacteria co-existed in the treatment system, which led to a sustainable sulfur transformation. High metal removal efficiency for Fe (99.6%, 92.5%), Cd (99.9%, 99.9%), Zn (99.4%, 98.5%), Cu (94.5%, 94.6%) except for Mn (9.3%, 3.6%) was achieved, and effluent pH increased to 6.5-7.7 and 6.7-7.7 for SRB-1 and SRB-2, respectively. Microbial community was regulated by filling substrates. Synergism between lignocellulosic decomposing bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria played a vital role in lignocellulosic bioreactor treating AMD, in addition to fermentation liquid serving as effective electron donor.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]