These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A Prospective Comparative Study of 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT Versus 123 I-MIBG Scintigraphy With SPECT/CT for the Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.
    Author: Sung C, Lee HS, Lee DY, Kim YI, Kim JE, Lee SJ, Oh SJ, Sung TY, Lee YM, Kim YH, Kim BJ, Koh JM, Lee SH, Ryu JS.
    Journal: Clin Nucl Med; 2024 Jan 01; 49(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 38054497.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT and 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy with SPECT/CT for detection of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-institution comparative study. Patients suspected of having PPGL or those showing recurrence and/or distant metastasis of PPGL were enrolled. The primary objective was to affirm the noninferiority of 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT for diagnostic sensitivity. Both 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy with SPECT/CT (at 4 and 24 hours) and 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT (at 5 and 60 minutes after radiotracer administration) were performed. The final diagnosis was established either pathologically or via clinical follow-up. Nuclear physicians, unaware of the clinical data, undertook image analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were evaluated: 14 of 21 with an initial diagnosis and 9 of 11 with recurrence/metastasis had PPGLs in their final diagnoses. In patient-based analyses, 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT (95.7%) exhibited noninferior sensitivity compared with 123 I-MIBG SPECT/CT (91.3%), within the predetermined noninferiority margin of -12% by a 95% confidence interval lower limit of -10%. Both modalities showed no significant difference in specificity (88.9% vs 88.9%). In the region-based analysis for the recurrence/metastasis group, 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared with 123 I-MIBG SPECT/CT (86.2% vs 65.5%, P = 0.031) and superior interobserver agreement (κ = 0.94 vs 0.85). The inclusion of an early phase in dual-phase 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT slightly improved diagnostic performance, albeit not to a statistically significant degree. CONCLUSIONS: 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT demonstrated noninferior sensitivity and comparable specificity to 123 I-MIBG SPECT/CT in the diagnosing PPGL. Notably, in the assessment of PPGL recurrence and metastasis, 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT outperformed 123 I-MIBG SPECT/CT in terms of both sensitivity and interobserver agreement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]