These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Physeal Fractures of the Distal Ulna: Incidence and Risk Factors for Premature Growth Arrest.
    Author: Lee J, Värk PR, Mendenhall SD, Chang B, Buttrick E, Shah AS.
    Journal: J Pediatr Orthop; 2024 Mar 01; 44(3):151-156. PubMed ID: 38062866.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the rate of distal ulnar growth arrest following physeal fracture and to identify specific risk factors for premature physeal closure. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with a distal ulnar physeal fracture was performed at a single United States children's hospital. Patients without 6-month follow-up were excluded. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted. Fractures were classified by the Salter-Harris (SH) system. All follow-up radiographs were reviewed for changes in ulnar variance or signs of premature physeal arrest. RESULTS: Fifty-six children with distal ulnar physeal fracture at a mean age of 10.7±3.3 years were included with a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. The most common fracture pattern was a SH II (52.7%), versus SH I (29.1%), SH III (9.1%), and SH IV (9.1%). Of displaced fractures (41.1%), the mean translation was 40.2±38.3% the and mean angulation was 24.8±20.9 degrees. Eleven fractures (19.6%) demonstrated radiographic signs of growth disturbance, including 3 patients (5.4%) with growth disturbance but continued longitudinal growth and 8 patients (14.3%) with complete growth arrest. The average ulnar variance was -3.4 mm. Three patients underwent subsequent surgical reconstruction including ulnar lengthening with an external fixator, distal ulna completion epiphysiodesis with distal radius epiphysiodesis, and ulnar corrective osteotomy. Patients with displaced fractures and SH III/IV fractures were more likely to develop a growth disturbance (34.8% vs. 3.2%, P =0.003; 50.0% vs. 11.1%, P =0.012, respectively). Children with less than 2 years of skeletal growth remaining at the time of injury had a higher risk of growth disturbance (46.2% vs. 9.5%, P =0.007). CONCLUSIONS: SH III and IV fractures are more common injury patterns in the distal ulna compared with the distal radius. Growth disturbance or growth arrest occurs in ~20% of distal ulnar physeal fractures. Displaced fractures, intra-articular fractures, fractures requiring open reduction, and older children are at increased risk of distal ulnar growth arrest and should be followed more closely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV--case series.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]