These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Accelerating acquisition of readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) with a simultaneous multislice (SMS) technique for diffusion-weighted (DW) breast MRI: Evaluation of image quality factors.
    Author: Ahn HS, Kim SH, Kim JY, Hong MJ, Lee HS.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 170():111251. PubMed ID: 38128255.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, and scan time between readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) rs-EPI sequences. METHODS: A total of 80 consecutive women who underwent breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were included, and two rs-EPI DWI sequences with and without SMS were acquired and compared. Qualitative analysis involved three radiologists independently scoring image quality and radiologist preference. For quantitative comparison, the radiologists independently measured the ADC values in patients, while SNR, CNR, and ADC values were measured on a phantom. RESULTS: The acquisition time was 5:47 min for rs-EPI and 3:20 min for SMS rs-EPI. In terms of image quality, scores were similar between rs-EPI and SMS rs-EPI sequences in the pooled data set, with the exception of skin-line distinction (p = 0.001) and background noise (p < 0.001). All radiologists considered SMS rs-EPI as equal or superior to rs-EPI in more than 70 % of cases. SMS rs-EPI demonstrated significantly higher ADC values than rs-EPI by all radiologists (p ≤ 0.002). For the phantom measurement, ADC (SMS: 1.26 ± 0.68 and RS: 1.26 ± 0.68, p = 0.198), SNR (SMS: 540.6 ± 342.1 and RS: 558.8 ± 523.2, p = 0.927), and CNR (SMS: 235.5 ± 38.9 and RS: 252.8 ± 108.0, p = 0.784) values did not significantly differ between the two sequences. CONCLUSION: SMS rs-EPI exhibited comparable image quality and similar ADC, SNR, and CNR values to rs-EPI while reducing the scan time by 42%.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]