These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Durability of Adalimumab and Infliximab in Children With Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Comparison From the epi-IIRN Cohort.
    Author: Atia O, Friss C, Focht G, Magen Rimon R, Ledderman N, Ben-Tov A, Loewenberg Weisband Y, Matz E, Gorelik Y, Chowers Y, Dotan I, Turner D.
    Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2024 Nov 04; 30(11):2097-2104. PubMed ID: 38190498.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In a nationwide cohort, we aimed to compare the durability of infliximab and adalimumab as first biologic treatment in children with Crohn's disease (CD), stratified as combotherapy or monotherapy. METHODS: We used data from the epi-IIRN cohort that includes all patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in Israel. Durability was defined as consistent treatment without surgery or treatment escalation. All comparisons followed stringent propensity-score matching in Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of the 3487 children diagnosed with CD since 2005, 2157 (62%) received biologics (1127 [52%] infliximab, 964 [45%] adalimumab and 52 [2%] vedolizumab as first biologic), representing a higher proportion than that among adults diagnosed during the same time period (5295 of 15 776 [34%]; P < .001). Time from diagnosis to initiation of biologic was shorter in pediatric-onset compared with adult-onset disease (median time during the last 3 years was 2.7 months [interquartile range 1.2-5.4] vs 5.2 months [2.6-8.9]; P < .001). The durability of adalimumab monotherapy after 1 and 5 years from initiation of treatment was better than infliximab monotherapy (79%/54% vs 67%/37%, respectively; n = 452 matched children; hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.3; P < .001), while in those treated with combotherapy, durability was similar (94%/66% with infliximab vs 90%/54% with adalimumab; n = 100; HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.9-3.3; P = .1). Durability was higher in children treated with infliximab combotherapy vs infliximab monotherapy (87%/45% vs 75%/39%; n = 440; HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .01). The durability of adalimumab monotherapy was similar to infliximab combotherapy (83%/53% vs 89%/56%, respectively; n = 238; HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2; P = .4). CONCLUSION: Our results support using adalimumab monotherapy as a first-line biologic in children with CD. When infliximab is used, combotherapy may be advantageous over monotherapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]