These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Improving Concussion Education: Do Athletic Trainers' Opinions Match Expert Consensus?
    Author: Drattell JD, Kroshus E, Register-Mihalik JK, D'Lauro C, Schmidt JD.
    Journal: J Athl Train; 2024 Aug 01; 59(8):801-808. PubMed ID: 38243731.
    Abstract:
    CONTEXT: The National Collegiate Athletic Association and Department of Defense (NCAA-DoD) Mind Matters Challenge created "useful and feasible" consensus recommendations to improve concussion care-seeking behavior in collegiate athletes and military cadets. Given athletic trainers' (ATs') role as providers of concussion education and medical care, it is important to understand if they agree with the expert panel that the recommendations are useful and feasible. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the perceptions of ATs in the secondary school (SS) and collegiate settings of the utility and feasibility of the NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations on improving concussion education. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Electronic survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred fifteen (515) ATs (age = 40.7 ± 12.4 years, 53.1% female gender) practicing in the SS (60.6%) or collegiate (38.4%) setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): An online survey asked participants about their awareness of the statement followed by 17 pairs of Likert-item questions regarding each recommendation's utility and feasibility with responses ranging from no (1) to yes (9). Mimicking the consensus process, we defined consensus as a mean rating of ≥7.00. We compared utility and feasibility rating responses between SS and collegiate setting participants using Mann-Whitney U tests with α = .05. RESULTS: Two-thirds (66.6%) of participants were unaware of the consensus statement. Participants felt all recommendations were useful (all means ≥ 7.0); however, 4 recommendations related to collaborating with stakeholders did not meet the feasibility cutoff (mean range = 6.66-6.84). Secondary school ATs rated lower feasibility related to educational content (P value range = .001-.014), providing patient education throughout recovery (P = .002), and promoting peer intervention (P = .019) but higher utility (P = .007) and feasibility (P = .002) for providing parent education than collegiate ATs. CONCLUSIONS: The NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations require further dissemination. Athletic trainers rated collaboration with stakeholders as a feasibility barrier. Secondary school ATs require more resources for educational content, messaging, and promoting peer intervention but find educating athletes' parents more useful and feasible than collegiate ATs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]