These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: On the reliability of single-camera markerless systems for overground gait monitoring.
    Author: Boldo M, Di Marco R, Martini E, Nardon M, Bertucco M, Bombieri N.
    Journal: Comput Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 171():108101. PubMed ID: 38340440.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Motion analysis is crucial for effective and timely rehabilitative interventions on people with motor disorders. Conventional marker-based (MB) gait analysis is highly time-consuming and calls for expensive equipment, dedicated facilities and personnel. Markerless (ML) systems may pave the way to less demanding gait monitoring, also in unsupervised environments (i.e., in telemedicine). However,scepticism on clinical usability of relevant outcome measures has hampered its use. ML is normally used to analyse treadmill walking, which is significantly different from the more physiological overground walking. This study aims to provide end-users with instructions on using a single-camera markerless system to obtain reliable motion data from overground walking, while clinicians will be instructed on the reliability of obtained quantities. METHODS: The study compares kinematics obtained from ML systems to those concurrently obtained from marker-based systems, considering different stride counts and subject positioning within the capture volume. RESULTS: The findings suggest that five straight walking trials are sufficient for collecting reliable kinematics with ML systems. Precision on joint kinematics decreased at the boundary of the capture volume. Excellent correlation was found between ML and MB systems for hip and knee angles (0.92<R2<0.96), with slightly lower correlations observed for ankle plantar-dorsiflexion. The Bland-Altman analysis indicated the largest bias for hip flexion/extension ([0.2∘,10.9∘]) and the smallest for knee joint ([0.1∘,0.8∘]) when comparing MB-PiG and MB-JC approaches. For MB-JC vs. ML-JC comparison, the largest bias was for the ankle joint ([1.2∘,11.8∘]), while the smallest was for the hip joint ([0.2∘,7.3∘]). CONCLUSION: Single-camera markerless motion capture systems have great potential in assessing human joint kinematics during overground walking. Clinicians can confidently rely on estimated joint kinematics while walking, enabling personalized interventions and improving accessibility to remote evaluation and rehabilitation services, as long as: (i) the camera is positioned to capture someone walking back and forth at least five times with good visibility of the entire body silhouette; (ii) the walking path is at least 2 m long; and (iii) images captured at the boundaries of the camera image plane should be discarded.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]