These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: High Resting Coronary Flow Velocity by Echocardiography Is Associated With Worse Survival in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes.
    Author: Cortigiani L, Gaibazzi N, Ciampi Q, Rigo F, Rodríguez-Zanella H, Wierzbowska-Drabik K, Kasprzak JD, Arbucci R, Lowenstein J, Zagatina A, Bartolacelli Y, Gregori D, Carerj S, Pepi M, Pellikka PA, Picano E, Stress Echo 2030 study group.
    Journal: J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Feb 20; 13(4):e031270. PubMed ID: 38362899.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Resting coronary flow velocity (CFV) in the mid-distal left anterior descending coronary artery can be easily assessed with transthoracic echocardiography. In this observational study, the authors sought to assess the relationship between resting CFV, CFV reserve (CFVR), and outcome in patients with chronic coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective multicenter study design, the authors retrospectively analyzed 7576 patients (age, 66±11 years; 4312 men) with chronic coronary syndromes and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Recruitment (years 2003-2021) involved 7 accredited laboratories, with interobserver variability <10% for CFV measurement at study entry. Baseline peak diastolic CFV was obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler in the mid-distal left anterior descending coronary artery. CFVR (abnormal value ≤2.0) was assessed with dipyridamole. All-cause death was the only end point. The mean CFV of the left anterior descending coronary artery was 31±12 cm/s. The mean CFVR was 2.32±0.60. During a median follow-up of 5.9±4.3 years, 1121 (15%) patients died. At multivariable analysis, resting CFV ≥32 cm/s was identified by a receiver operating curve as the best cutoff and was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10-1.40]; P<0.0001) together with CFVR ≤2.0 (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.57-2.02]; P<0.0001), age, diabetes, history of coronary surgery, and left ventricular ejection fraction. When both CFV and CFVR were considered, the mortality rate was highest in patients with resting CFV ≥32 cm/s and CFVR ≤2.0 and lowest in patients with resting CFV <32 cm/s and CFVR >2.0. CONCLUSIONS: High resting CFV is associated with worse survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The value is independent and additive to CFVR. The combination of high resting CFV and low CFVR is associated with the worst survival.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]