These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Can Internal Carotid Arteries Be Used for Noninvasive Quantification of Brain PET Studies?
    Author: Providência L, van der Weijden CWJ, Mohr P, van Sluis J, van Snick JH, Slart RHJA, Dierckx RAJO, Lammertsma AA, Tsoumpas C.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 2024 Apr 01; 65(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 38485272.
    Abstract:
    Because of the limited axial field of view of conventional PET scanners, the internal carotid arteries are commonly used to obtain an image-derived input function (IDIF) in quantitative brain PET. However, time-activity curves extracted from the internal carotids are prone to partial-volume effects due to the limited PET resolution. This study aimed to assess the use of the internal carotids for quantifying brain glucose metabolism before and after partial-volume correction. Methods: Dynamic [18F]FDG images were acquired on a 106-cm-long PET scanner, and quantification was performed with a 2-tissue-compartment model and Patlak analysis using an IDIF extracted from the internal carotids. An IDIF extracted from the ascending aorta was used as ground truth. Results: The internal carotid IDIF underestimated the area under the curve by 37% compared with the ascending aorta IDIF, leading to Ki values approximately 17% higher. After partial-volume correction, the mean relative Ki differences calculated with the ascending aorta and internal carotid IDIFs dropped to 7.5% and 0.05%, when using a 2-tissue-compartment model and Patlak analysis, respectively. However, microparameters (K 1, k 2, k 3) derived from the corrected internal carotid curve differed significantly from those obtained using the ascending aorta. Conclusion: These results suggest that partial-volume-corrected internal carotids may be used to estimate Ki but not kinetic microparameters. Further validation in a larger patient cohort with more variable kinetics is needed for more definitive conclusions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]