These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Descriptive study of general practitioner's practices and knowledge about Parkinson's disease in the north of France.
    Author: Aubignat M, Skierkowski H, Tir M.
    Journal: Rev Neurol (Paris); 2024 Sep; 180(7):650-654. PubMed ID: 38556412.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD), the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease, constitutes a major public health challenge. A guide published by the French National Authority for Health in 2012 and revised in 2016 put forward recommendations for general practitioners (GP) planning care pathways for parkinsonian patients. It is well known that PD can be difficult to diagnose, and that when patients consult their GP, symptoms are often still limited and embedded in clinical uncertainty. This means the pathway to confirmed diagnosis of PD can be lengthy and uncertain. Consequently, it is important to identify the difficulties GPs encounter when caring for PD patients in order to help them better close the gaps in care strategies. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional survey in northern France to evaluate GP practices and knowledge about PD and their accordance with care pathway recommendations. The survey was conducted using a 30-item questionnaire sent to a sample of GPs. RESULTS: There were 164 GPs who responded to the study questionnaire. The responding GPs generally followed current care pathway recommendations. In presence of a parkinsonian syndrome, 93.3% of the GPs reported systematically looking for an iatrogenic cause; 57.4% did not announce the diagnosis without the advice of a neurologist; 97.6% referred patients to a neurologist when they suspected PD; and 80.5% asked the neurologist to modify treatments. Our findings also revealed some difficult aspects of GP practices: only 2.5% had had additional training in neurology; only 53.6% felt comfortable with the diagnosis of PD; 63.6% prescribed additional exams for the diagnosis; most of the GPs were unaware of second-line treatments and their indications, and finally existence of PD expert centers was unknown for 85.2%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings could be useful to guide implementation of new measures supporting more holistic care for PD patients; PD expert centers in France could provide complementary information and training for GPs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]