These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Differing patterns of cortical grey matter pathology identified by multifractal analysis in UMN-predominant ALS patients with and without corticospinal tract hyperintensity. Author: Rajagopalan V, Pioro EP. Journal: J Neurol Sci; 2024 Apr 15; 459():122945. PubMed ID: 38564847. Abstract: The pathological hallmarks of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are degeneration of the primary motor cortex grey matter (GM) and corticospinal tract (CST) resulting in upper motor neuron (UMN) dysfunction. Conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows abnormal CST hyperintensity in some UMN-predominant ALS patients (ALS-CST+) but not in others (ALS-CST-). In addition to the CST differences, we aimed to determine whether GM degeneration differs between ALS-CST+ and ALS-CST- patients by cortical thickness (CT), voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and fractal dimension analyses. We hypothesized that MRI multifractal (MF) measures could differentiate between neurologic controls (n = 14) and UMN-predominant ALS patients as well as between patient subgroups (ALS-CST+, n = 21 vs ALS-CST-, n = 27). No significant differences were observed in CT or GM VBM in any brain regions between patients and controls or between ALS subgroups. MF analyses were performed separately on GM of the whole brain, of frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes as well as of cerebellum. Estimating MF measures D (Q = 0), D (Q = 1), D (Q = 2), Δf, Δα of frontal lobe GM classified neurologic controls, ALS-CST+ and ALS-CST- groups with 98% accuracy and > 95% in F1, recall, precision and specificity scores. Classification accuracy was only 74% when using whole brain MF measures and < 70% for other brain lobes. We demonstrate that MF analysis can distinguish UMN-predominant ALS subgroups based on GM changes, which the more commonly used quantitative approaches of CT and VBM cannot.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]