These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Forefoot Morphotypes in Cavovarus Feet: A Novel Assessment of Deformity.
    Author: Malhotra K, Patel S, Cullen N, Welck M.
    Journal: Foot Ankle Int; 2024 Jul; 45(7):746-756. PubMed ID: 38618692.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The cavovarus foot is a complex 3-dimensional deformity. Although a multitude of techniques are described for its surgical management, few of these are evidence based or guided by classification systems. Surgical management involves realignment of the hindfoot and soft tissue balancing, followed by forefoot balancing. Our aim was to analyze the pattern of residual forefoot deformities once the hindfoot is corrected, to guide forefoot correction. METHODS: We included 20 cavovarus feet from 16 adult patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth who underwent weightbearing CT (mean age 43.4 years, range: 22-78 years, 14 males). Patients included had flexible deformities, with no previous surgery. Using specialized software (Bonelogic 2.1, Disior) a 3-dimensional, virtual model was created. Using morphologic data captured from normal feet in patients without pathology as a guide, the talonavicular joint of the cavovarus foot was digitally reduced to a "normal" position to simulate the correction that would be achieved during surgical correction. Models of the corrected position were exported and geometrically analyzed using Blender 3.64 to identify anatomical trends. RESULTS: We identified 4 types of cavovarus forefoot morphotypes. Type 0 was defined as a balanced forefoot (2 cases, 10%). Type 1 was defined as a forefoot where the first metatarsal was relatively plantarflexed to the rest of the foot, with no significant residual adduction after talonavicular joint correction (12 cases, 60%). Type 2 was defined as a forefoot where the second and first metatarsals were progressively plantarflexed, with no significant adduction (4 cases, 20%). Type 3 was defined as a forefoot where the metatarsals were adducted after talonavicular derotation (2 cases, 10%). CONCLUSION: In this relatively small cohort, we identified 4 forefoot morphotypes in cavovarus feet that might help surgeons to recognize and anticipate the residual forefoot deformities after hindfoot correction. Different treatment strategies may be required for different morphotypes to achieve balanced correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]