These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit.
    Author: Yamada T, Kay GN.
    Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2024 May; 17(5):e012548. PubMed ID: 38629301.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Epicardial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the left ventricular summit (LVS) is challenging because of the anatomic barriers. On the other hand, RFCA at the endocardial sites near the earliest epicardial activation site of LVS-VAs (anatomic approach) has proven successful. The evolving trends in the approaches and outcomes of RFCA of LVS-VAs at a single center were evaluated. METHODS: We studied 88 consecutive patients with idiopathic LVS-VAs at our institute from 2009 to 2019. These patients were divided into 3 periods: 2009 to 2012 (early), 2013 to 2015 (middle), and 2016 to 2019 (recent). The data were compared among the 3 periods. RESULTS: The RFCA success rate did not significantly change from the early to middle period but significantly increased from the middle to recent period (P=0.0315). The transpericardial approach usage significantly decreased over the 3 periods. The anatomic approach usage significantly increased over the 3 periods. The use of the transpericardial approach did not affect the RFCA outcomes over the 3 periods. The success rate of the anatomic RFCA tended to increase from the early to middle period and significantly increased from the middle to recent period (P=0.0412). The number of endocardial locations where RFCA was successful increased over the 3 periods. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 10-year period, the transpericardial approach became decreasingly performed, whereas the anatomic approach became increasingly performed with a satisfactory improvement in the RFCA outcomes of LVS-VAs. The anatomic RFCA became more successful by identifying more and various endocardial locations as target sites.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]