These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interplatform comparison between three ion mobility techniques for human plasma lipid collision cross sections.
    Author: George AC, Schmitz I, Rouvière F, Alves S, Colsch B, Heinisch S, Afonso C, Fenaille F, Loutelier-Bourhis C.
    Journal: Anal Chim Acta; 2024 May 22; 1304():342535. PubMed ID: 38637036.
    Abstract:
    The implementation of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) in liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) workflows has become a valuable tool for improving compound annotation in metabolomics analyses by increasing peak capacity and by adding a new molecular descriptor, the collision cross section (CCS). Although some studies reported high repeatability and reproducibility of CCS determination and only few studies reported good interplatform agreement for small molecules, standardized protocols are still missing due to the lack of reference CCS values and reference materials. We present a comparison of CCS values of approximatively one hundred lipid species either commercially available or extracted from human plasma. We used three different commercial ion mobility technologies from different laboratories, drift tube IMS (DTIMS), travelling wave IMS (TWIMS) and trapped IMS (TIMS), to evaluate both instrument repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility. We showed that CCS discrepancies of 0.3% (average) could occur depending on the data processing software tools. Moreover, eleven CCS calibrants were evaluated yielding mean RSD below 2% for eight calibrants, ESI Low concentration tuning mix (Tune Mix) showing the lowest RSD (< 0.5%) in both ion modes. Tune Mix calibrated CCS from the three different IMS instruments proved to be well correlated and highly reproducible (R2 > 0.995 and mean RSD ≤ 1%). More than 90% of the lipid CCS had deviations of less than 1%, demonstrating high comparability between techniques, and the possibility to use the CCS as molecular descriptor. We highlighted the need of standardized procedures for calibration, data acquisition, and data processing. This work demonstrates that using harmonized analytical conditions are required for interplatform reproducibility for CCS determination of human plasma lipids.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]