These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Characteristic Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography Findings in Lower Extremity Lymphedema: Comparison to Indocyanine Green Lymphography.
    Author: Sakai H, Miyazaki T, Kanasaki M, Tsukuura R, Yamamoto T.
    Journal: Lymphat Res Biol; 2024 Jun; 22(3):190-194. PubMed ID: 38662456.
    Abstract:
    Introduction: Evaluation of lymph circulation is significant in lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) management. Single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) has been introduced for lymphedema evaluation, but its characteristic findings are yet fully clarified. The purpose of this study was to reveal typical SPECT-CT findings in secondary LEL by contrasting with indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography findings. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective case-control study. Medical charts of cancer survivors who underwent SPECT-CT and ICG lymphography for secondary LEL were reviewed. Lymphedematous limbs were defined as ICG lymphography stage I-V and non-lymphedematous limbs were defined as ICG lymphography stage 0. Characteristic SPECT-CT findings were identified in early phase and delay phase, and prevalence of the findings was compared between lymphedematous limbs and non-lymphedematous limbs. Results: Thirty-four limbs of 17 patients were included in this study; 6 (17.6%) non-lymphedematous limbs and 28 (82.4%) lymphedematous limbs. Four characteristic SPECT-CT findings were identified; delayed enhancement of the main lower leg lymphatic pathway (DML), few delayed inguinal lymph nodes enhancement (FDN), early phase discontinuous enhancement of the main lymphatic pathway (EDM), and nonenhancement of the deep lymphatic pathways in early phase (NDE). Between lymphedematous and non-lymphedematous limbs, there were statistically significant differences in FDN (64.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.004) and EDM (67.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: FDN and EDM are characteristic SPECT-CT findings in secondary LEL.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]