These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Octenidine exposure was not associated with reduced octenidine susceptibility of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an extended-care facility in Singapore.
    Author: Tang YW, Hon PY, Tan J, Poh BF, Ang B, Chow A.
    Journal: J Hosp Infect; 2024 Jul; 149():104-107. PubMed ID: 38670494.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: Antiseptics such as chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) are frequently used in hospitals to prevent and control the transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Given the increasing prevalence of reduced CHG susceptibility of MRSA, there are concerns about the possibility of reduced OCT susceptibility. This study evaluated the prevalence of reduced CHG and OCT susceptibility over 3 years, and assessed the association between OCT exposure and reduced OCT susceptibility in MRSA. METHODS: MRSA isolates from inpatients who acquired MRSA in an extended-care facility between 2019 and 2021 were included in antiseptic susceptibility testing. Inpatients were exposed to universal daily CHG bathing from January to September 2019, and universal daily OCT bathing after October 2019. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CHG and OCT were determined using the broth microdilution method. Multi-variable logistic regression was used to assess if OCT exposure was independently associated with reduced OCT susceptibility. RESULTS: Of 186 isolates, 179 (96%) had reduced CHG susceptibility (MIC ≥4 mg/L) and 46 (25%) had reduced OCT susceptibility (MIC ≥2 mg/L). Reduced OCT susceptibility rates were 26.9%, 13.8% and 14.3% in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Reduced CHG susceptibility rates were 95.4%, 100% and 95.9% in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. OCT exposure was not associated with reduced OCT susceptibility (adjusted odds ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.75; P=0.014), after adjusting for age, gender, race, year of sample collection, days at risk in facility, hospitalization in preceding year, and MRSA colonization/infection in preceding year. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of reduced OCT susceptibility has remained low, despite universal OCT bathing for extended inpatient care. However, the rate of reduced CHG susceptibility was high. OCT exposure was not associated with reduced OCT susceptibility in MRSA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]