These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dehiscence and Fistula Formation Following Anterior Palatal Reconstruction With Vomer Flap.
    Author: Menville JE, Spake C, Soliman L, Shinde N, Persad-Paisley EM, Baranwal N, Woo AS.
    Journal: J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun 01; 35(4):1101-1104. PubMed ID: 38727218.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anterior palatal reconstruction using vomer flaps has been described during primary cleft lip repair. In this procedure, the mucoperiosteal tissue of the vomer is elevated to reconstruct the nasal mucosa overlying the cleft of the hard palate. Here the authors, evaluate the efficacy of a technique in which a superiorly based vomer flap is sutured to the lateral nasal mucosa. The authors assess vomer flap dehiscence rates and compare the likelihood of fistula development in this cohort to patients who underwent palatoplasty without vomer flap reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all palatoplasties performed by the senior author at an academic institution during a 7-year period. Medical records were reviewed for demographic variables, operative characteristics, and postoperative complications up to 1 year following surgery. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the effects of vomer flap reconstruction on fistula formation, adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (N=58) patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 38 patients (control group) underwent cleft palate reconstruction without previous vomer flap placement. The remaining 20 patients underwent cleft lip repair with vomer flap reconstruction before palatoplasty (vomer flap group). When bilateral cases were counted independently, 25 total vomer flap reconstructions were performed. Seventeen of these 25 vomer flap reconstructions (68%) were completely dehisced by the time of cleft palate repair. In the vomer flap group, 3 of the 20 patients (15%) developed fistulas in the anterior hard palate following the subsequent palatoplasty procedure. In the control group, only 1 of the 38 patients (2.6%) developed a fistula in the anterior hard palate. There was no significant association between cohorts and the development of anterior hard palate fistulas [odds ratio=10.88, 95% confidence interval (0.99-297.77) P =0.07], although analysis was limited by low statistical power due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, anterior palatal reconstruction using a superiorly based vomer flap technique was associated with complete dehiscence in 68% of cases. Fistula formation in the anterior hard palate was also proportionately higher following initial vomer flap reconstruction (15% versus 2.6%). These results prompted the senior author to adjust his surgical technique to 1 in which the vomer flap overlaps the oral mucosa. While follow-up from these adjusted vomer flap reconstruction cases remains ongoing, early evidence suggests a reduced requirement for surgical revision following implementation of the modified technique.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]