These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Mapping Neurophysiological Patterns in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Correlations With Tinel's and Phalen's Signs.
    Author: Saggar SK, Thaman RG, Mohan G, Kumar D.
    Journal: Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58168. PubMed ID: 38741883.
    Abstract:
    Background This study aimed to observe the neurophysiological severity grading of carpel tunnel syndrome (CTS) using nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and the correlation between Tinel's and Phalen's signs. Methodology In this cross-sectional study, 240 patients of CTS were enrolled. NCSs were conducted in 480 hands. Various variables such as distal latency, amplitude, and nerve conduction velocity in both sensory and motor median nerves were recorded. The provocative tests capable of reproducing patients' symptoms such as Phalen's test and Tinel's test were performed on all 480 hands studied. Results Neurophysiological variables were affected in 449 out of 480 hands. Tinel's sign was observed in 59% of cases (265 hands) while Phalen's sign was positive in 37.2% (167 hands) of cases. Severity grading of CTS based on neurophysiological variables resulted in Grade I (mild) in 202 hands, Grade II (mild to moderate) in 56 hands, Grade III (moderate) in 39 hands, and Grade IV (severe) in 152 hands. Provocative tests (Tinel's and Phalen's) used for the diagnosis of CTS were positive in 68 hands (36.66%) and 26 hands (12.8%), respectively, in mild Grade I. However, as the CTS severity grade increased, the provocative test success rate also increased simultaneously. In severe Grade IV CTS, Tinel's and Phalen's tests were positive in 134 (88.1%) hands and 94 (61.8%) hands, respectively. Conclusions This study underscores the unreliability of Tinel's and Phalen's signs as screening methods for CTS severity. With moderate sensitivity and specificity, NCSs are deemed essential for confirming CTS diagnosis and assessing severity, especially in mild cases that might be mistakenly perceived as normal hands by consultants.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]