These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Stapling devices in gastrointestinal surgery.
    Author: Tuchmann A, Dinstl K, Strasser K, Armbruster C.
    Journal: Int Surg; 1985; 70(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3874849.
    Abstract:
    In a series of 189 patients, 197 operations (251 stapled anastomoses) were performed. U.S. Surgical Corporation instruments (GIA n = 156, EEA n = 36, TA n = 59) were used in surgery of the stomach, pancreas, small and large bowel, and the rates of complications were investigated. The EEA gave 14% complications because of the frequent failure (33%) of the anastomosis after low anterior resection. The reasons for failure were incomplete rings, colonic wall damage and too short rectal stumps. The use of the EEA in esophago-jejunostomy and esophago-gastrostomy was safe and the postoperative course uneventful. The GIA was used in intestinal and colonic surgery and was pleasant and quick to use (right hemicolectomy: 1 hour 40 minutes; sigmoid resection: 1 hour 45 minutes). Complications occurred in the intestine (6%) and colon (7%). Only with GIA stapled anastomoses was there a risk of hemorrhage (2.5%). The incidence of anastomotic leakage (all staplers) was 3.6%; the stapler was responsible for a 2.0% mortality. Weighing up the indications and contraindications of stapling devices, this method presents an advantageous but not indispensable method in gastrointestinal surgery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]