These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Urgent relaparotomy: the high-risk, no-choice operation.
    Author: Bunt TJ.
    Journal: Surgery; 1985 Sep; 98(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 3875907.
    Abstract:
    Two thousand six hundred fifty-seven primary laparotomies were performed during a 50-month period; 192 (7%) of these were relaparotomies within 21 days for complications of primary laparotomy. The overall mortality rate was 36% (69/192). Relaparotomy for dehiscence (0/15) or obstruction (5%-1/21) carried little risk and for abscess a moderate risk (13%-6/47). Relaparotomy for gastrointestinal or intraperitoneal hemorrhage entailed higher risks at 44% (4/9) and 27% (6/22), respectively. Age was a significant determinant of mortality, being 16% (13/82) for less than 50 years of age but 50% (56/110) for greater than 50 years (p less than 0.001). The major determinant at all age groups was sepsis, varying from 50% (4/8) for patients less than 50 years to 89% (34/38) for patients greater than 50 years (p less than 0.01). Differentiation was made between localized intra-abdominal infection (IAS-1) and nonlocalized/systemic infection (IAS-2): the mortality rate for 47 patients with IAS-1 was 13% and for IAS-2 83% (p less than 0.001). Urgent relaparotomy is necessary and may be performed safely for incisional dehiscence, obstruction, or IAS-1, with low mortality and high patient salvage rates. Directed relaparotomy for IAS-2 carries a high mortality rate but is the only means of patient salvage. Nondirected relaparotomy for multiple system and organ failure alone without supportive clinical or radiologic findings was futile, with a 13% (2/15) rate of positive exploration (p less than 0.001) and no patient salvage.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]